Do Dallas buyers actually have to sign a written agreement with a Realtor before seeing a single home, and what does that mean for someone just starting their search in Highland Park, Preston Hollow, or Frisco?
Yes. As of January 1, 2026, Texas Senate Bill 1968 requires every Dallas buyer to sign a written agreement with a Realtor before being shown any residential property. The agreement can be short, limited in scope, and non-exclusive, but it must be signed before the first showing.
Dallas buyers walking into 2026 are running into a brand new first step they did not encounter in any previous market cycle. Before they tour a single property in Highland Park, before they pull up to an open house in Lakewood, before a builder rep in Frisco hands them a brochure, a written agreement has to be signed. The change is driven by Texas Senate Bill 1968, which took effect statewide on January 1, 2026 and rewrote how agency relationships between buyers and brokers work. It sits on top of the 2024 National Association of Realtors settlement, which already changed how buyer agent compensation is negotiated.
For most buyers, the practical question is simple: what does the agreement say, what are they committing to, and how do they avoid signing something that locks them in for a year with the wrong agent? This guide walks through exactly what the law requires, how Dallas brokerages are interpreting it, what the agreement should and should not include, and the specific questions every buyer should ask before signing in a market where median Park Cities home prices sit between 2.1 and 2.7 million dollars and even an entry-level Preston Hollow renovation can clear 1.4 million.
The statute is precise. A Texas real estate license holder who performs any “substantive” act of brokerage on behalf of a buyer must enter into a written agreement with that buyer before showing any residential property, or, if no property is shown, before presenting an offer on behalf of that buyer. Substantive acts include giving advice, sharing market analysis, negotiating terms, and writing or presenting offers. Unlocking a door so a buyer can walk through a vacant house is not, by itself, a substantive act under the new framework, but as soon as the agent starts answering questions about comparable sales on Beverly Drive or whether 3.2 million is a reasonable number for a particular Bluffview tear-down, the written agreement requirement kicks in.
Two important nuances apply in Dallas. First, if the agent is already representing the seller of the property in question, a separate buyer agreement is not required for that single transaction, because the agency relationship is governed by intermediary disclosures rather than buyer representation. Second, the agreement does not have to be exclusive or long. A buyer can sign a one-property, one-day, non-exclusive showing-only agreement and walk away owing nothing. The law sets a floor, not a ceiling.
The new rule arrived at the same time as several other shifts that are reshaping Dallas transactions. The 2024 NAR settlement ended the practice of advertising buyer agent compensation in the MLS, which means Dallas sellers are no longer assumed to be paying the buyer’s agent. Buyer agent commissions in the Dallas-Fort Worth area have rebounded to an average of roughly 2.52 percent on homes under 500,000 dollars in early 2026, but that compensation now has to be negotiated separately, in writing, between the buyer and the buyer’s agent before any home is shown.
On top of that, Dallas inventory is up sharply, sitting roughly 22 percent above year-ago levels in early 2026, and the market is more buyer-leaning than it has been since 2019. The Dallas median sale price is off about 3.9 percent from the recent peak. Sellers are negotiating, builders in Frisco, Prosper, and Celina are offering 100 to 200 basis point rate buydowns, and buyer agents are working harder to earn each transaction. SB 1968 simply formalizes who is representing whom and how that representation is paid for, in an environment where the answer is no longer automatic.
Buyers should expect to be presented with one of two forms.
The first is a non-representation, showing-only agreement. This is the lightest possible touch. The Realtor agrees to unlock and walk the buyer through one specific home or a short list of homes, on a single day or over a defined window, and the agent is not representing the buyer’s interests in any negotiation. No commission is owed. Buyers using this form typically do so when they want to see a specific Highland Park listing or a new build in Phillips Creek Ranch with no commitment.
The second is a buyer representation agreement. This is the more substantive document and is the one buyers should expect when they want a Realtor to actually advocate for them, write offers, run comps in Devonshire or Lake Highlands, and negotiate inspection items. It will spell out the scope of representation, the term, the geographic area, the compensation structure (including what happens if the seller offers concessions and what happens if the seller offers nothing), buyer obligations, and termination terms. This is the form most serious Dallas buyers will sign.
Under the post-settlement framework, three compensation paths show up in nearly every Dallas representation agreement. The first is seller-paid: the seller, through the listing agreement, offers a buyer agent concession, and that money flows to the buyer’s brokerage at closing. The second is buyer-paid: the buyer pays the agreed compensation directly out of pocket or rolls it into the financing where allowed. The third is hybrid: the seller covers part of the compensation and the buyer covers the gap.
In the Dallas market, the dominant pattern in early 2026 is still seller-paid concessions in the 2.5 to 3 percent range, but the negotiation is no longer automatic. A well-written buyer representation agreement caps the buyer’s exposure. If the agreement says the buyer’s brokerage will be paid 2.75 percent and the seller offers 2.5 percent, the buyer is responsible for the 0.25 percent gap, not the full amount. If the seller offers 3 percent, the brokerage cannot collect more than the agreed 2.75 percent. Buyers who skip this clause and sign a flat percentage with no offset language are the ones who get burned.
— continued in next reply ↓
[Part 2b/2 — Blog Body, second half]
Term length is where Dallas buyers have the most room to negotiate, and where many sign documents they later regret. A standard buyer representation agreement in Texas can run from one day to twelve months. A 90-day exclusive is a reasonable starting point for a buyer who has done a few showings with an agent and wants to commit to the working relationship. A six-month exclusive is appropriate for a serious buyer working with a specialist agent in a niche segment like Highland Park estate properties or Preston Hollow new construction, where the search may legitimately take longer.
Exclusivity means the buyer agrees not to work with another brokerage on the purchase of any property in the defined geographic area during the term, and if the buyer does buy through someone else, the original brokerage is still owed compensation. This is the clause that creates the most disputes. Buyers should pay close attention to two specific elements: the geographic carve-out and the protected property list. A buyer searching across Highland Park, University Park, and the M Streets should not sign an agreement that locks them in across all of Dallas County, and a buyer who already has a relationship with a specific listing should make sure that home is excluded from the exclusivity clause.
A few questions separate a buyer who signs intelligently from one who signs blindly. What is the term, and can it be shortened to 30, 60, or 90 days for a first commitment? What is the geographic area, and can it be narrowed to specific Dallas neighborhoods rather than the entire metroplex? What is the compensation, and does the agreement include the offset language that caps buyer exposure if the seller offers a concession? Is the agreement exclusive or non-exclusive, and what is the termination clause? Are new construction homes in Frisco, Prosper, or Celina included, given that builder commissions are paid differently than resale commissions? What happens if the agent stops responding, leaves the brokerage, or fails to deliver agreed services?
Each of these questions has a defensible answer from a competent Dallas Realtor. Vague or evasive responses are the signal to slow down.
Yes, but the terms matter. The Texas Real Estate Commission has been clear that buyers can cancel a buyer representation agreement, but only as the agreement itself permits. If the document includes a termination-for-cause clause and the agent has materially failed to perform (missed showings, ignored communications, lapsed license, ethical violations), termination is straightforward. If the document includes a no-fault termination clause with a defined notice period, the buyer can simply give notice and walk away. If the document is silent on termination, the buyer and brokerage have to negotiate a release, which a competent broker will typically grant rather than fight.
The harder situation is when a buyer signs an exclusive agreement, terminates without cause, and then closes on a home through a different brokerage during what would have been the protected period. In that case the original brokerage may still be owed compensation. Buyers who anticipate any chance of switching agents should make sure their initial agreement is non-exclusive, short-term, or both.
Three patterns have shown up repeatedly in the first months of the new law. The first is buyers signing whatever document the open house agent puts in front of them, often a 12-month exclusive across the entire DFW metroplex, just to see a single Park Cities listing. The second is buyers signing a flat-percentage compensation clause with no seller-concession offset, which exposes them to paying their agent twice when a seller is offering generous concessions anyway. The third is buyers assuming the agreement is purely a formality, signing without reading, and then discovering at offer time that they have committed to a brokerage they no longer want to work with.
All three are avoidable. The agreement is negotiable. Every term in it is negotiable. A Realtor who refuses to discuss term length, geographic scope, or compensation offset is signaling how they will negotiate on the buyer’s behalf later.
The buyer representation agreement is now a permanent feature of the Dallas home-buying process, and it is not going away. Approached carelessly it becomes a liability. Approached deliberately, with attention to term, scope, compensation structure, and termination rights, it becomes exactly what the law intends: a clear, written record of who is representing the buyer, what they will do, and how they will be paid. Dallas buyers who treat it that way will spend the next decade benefiting from clearer agency relationships and better-defined accountability from their agents.